Subscribe for 33¢ / day
Scott Walker at Gateway Technical College

The colors are presented before Gov. Scott Walker speaks at ceremonies marking the centennial of Gateway Technical College, Wisconsin's first technical college, at the school's Racine campus. Protesters jeered Walker during the event.

MARK HERTZBERG - Racine Journal Times

Amid all the analysts talking about what Tuesday's results mean, I'm most drawn to the New York Times' Nate Silver, who is the numbers guy I wish I were.

In a post he put up today, he writes that Tuesday's voting patterns suggest that Wisconsin Democrats have made significant inroads compared to November when Scott Walker won the governor's race. If you extrapolate Tuesday's results across the rest of the state, Silver says, a Walker recall election next year could be ultra-tight.

Now, conservatives will tell you that the Dems are now three-time losers in referendums on the Walker agenda and that the only real takeaway lesson from Tuesday night is that "it's probably not a good idea to cheat on your wife."

But looking at Silver's numbers, it appears the Dems made gains even in districts that didn't have tainted or doomed incumbents. Republican Luther Olsen of Ripon won 52 percent of the vote Tuesday night, for example, but Walker won 57 percent of the vote in that district in November.

Silver also points out that the actual candidates matter. Rob Cowles of Green Bay got a higher winning percentage in the 2nd Senate District that Walker did, which suggests that Cowles is a popular incumbent. The numbers I've seen tell me you can't say the same for Walker.

Writing today, David Catanese of Politico quotes GOP strategist Andrew Welhouse, who does raise a good point about how a gubernatorial recall election would be different for Democrats in a few months.

"The problem for them is resources -- where do they get the money? The national unions won't be playing anywhere near as hard after dropping all that cash," Welhouse tells Catanese, adding later that: "The pie is splitting much, much thinner for money and staff" because other big races will be coming up in 2012.

Like I said, good points, but wouldn't Walker suffer from the same problem? Conservative groups spent millions on Tuesday's elections, too, and are they going to go all in to save an embattled Walker when a U.S. Senate seat and Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes will be up for grabs in less than a year?

As Madison as it gets: Get Cap Times' highlights sent daily to your inbox

Silver says with the numbers favoring a recall try, it will come down to enthusiasm on the part of Democrats. It will indeed be hard to gather more than a half-million signatures, and yes, Tuesday's results were a setback, but state Dems say they're going to proceed with plans to recall Walker.

He sounds resigned to an election, and I suspect Republicans will be waiting until the wee hours sometime early next year, hoping the Waukesha County results will finally come in and bail them out just one more time.

Shortly after this went up, an alert reader pointed out this post to me on the Green Bay Press-Gazette's website. It says errors in the count in Outagamie County mean that Rob Cowles actual overall percentage of the vote was 56 percent rather than 60 percent.

That's still a comfortable win for Cowles, but it's a lesser margin than Walker had in November, lending further credence to Silver's argument that the governor could be in trouble in a recall election.