Crushing debt, fewer job prospects result in law school applicant decline

2013-02-02T06:00:00Z Crushing debt, fewer job prospects result in law school applicant declineSTEVEN ELBOW | The Capital Times | selbow@madison.com madison.com

The New York Times this week ran a story on the steep decline in law school applicants, which appears to be on track to hit a 30-year-low as prospective students weigh skyrocketing tuition (ranging from $20,000 to $45,000 a year) against diminishing job prospects.

The Times reported a 20 percent decrease in applicants from last year and a 38 percent falloff from 2010, leading law schools across the country to scale back admissions.

The UW Law School is following that trend. After a 27 percent decline in applicants since 2009 — from 2,951 to 2,153 — Law School Dean Margaret Raymond says the school made a conscious decision to cut back on admissions by 10 percent. The school enrolled 215 students last fall, compared with 278 in 2009.

The state’s other law school, at Marquette University, last fall actually admitted a few more students than in 2009, 224 this school year compared to 219 three years ago. But in that same period applicants dropped from 2,121 to 1,723, a 19 percent decline. Marquette Law School Dean Joseph Kearney didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.

“It’s not just that there are fewer applicants,” Raymond says, “but they’re weaker. So one of the things we’re looking to do is make sure we maintain the strength of the quality of students we’re admitting. That’s one thing that lots of law schools are being attentive to.

"And going down 10 percent, we were consistent with what a lot of our national colleagues were doing.”

According to the Times, the decline in available jobs is not just due to a glut of lawyers or a tightening of the job market because of a sour economy. It’s being driven in part by technological factors like the Internet, which make legal research easier and less time-consuming, and online legal forms, which can be filled out by people without a law degree.

Until the changes in the legal industry level out, it doesn’t make sense to keep pumping out more lawyers than the field can absorb, Raymond says.

“It’s not just that the economy is in a downturn,” she says. “I think because of changes in the nature of the practice that faucet isn’t likely to open up again in quite the same way. That isn’t to say there won’t be more work for lawyers. But we have to be creative and think about where it’s going to be and how people can best be prepared for it.”

In the short term, Raymond says, fewer students can mean more resources available for each one.

But in the future, who knows? Raymond says there's no telling how long the lawyer glut will last, or what the long-term impact on the Law School might be.

“Admitting as we did 25 students less in the first year doesn’t take us a really long way toward reducing our need for teachers,” she says. “But of course, it’s a challenging budget time. We’re consciously thinking all the time about strategies to get the most bang for our buck and to be really careful with our resources, as we have to do because we’re a public institution.”

Copyright 2014 madison.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(14) Comments

  1. Halvie
    Report Abuse
    Halvie - February 04, 2013 6:20 am
    Wisconsin is the only state that allows lawyers to set up practice without ever being required to pass the Bar exam, so the question of quality is moot.
  2. pete
    Report Abuse
    pete - February 03, 2013 9:54 am
    the next headline will be: "Crushing debt, fewer job prospects and MUCH lower pay result in medical school decline"

    All of you obamacare apologists know this is coming right?
  3. joe
    Report Abuse
    joe - February 02, 2013 10:54 pm
    They decide to decrease enrollment, but not staff or faculty? Oh yeah...it is the public sector.
  4. nufsenuf
    Report Abuse
    nufsenuf - February 02, 2013 8:35 pm
    While possibly the most beneficial effect of this econoomy, 10% is only a start. It will take a far greater reduction in lawyers to give out country hope for the future.
  5. Halvie
    Report Abuse
    Halvie - February 02, 2013 8:01 pm
    Lawyers exist only to profit from their own existence.
  6. Halvie
    Report Abuse
    Halvie - February 02, 2013 7:50 pm
    The practice of law is widely recognized as a thoroughly dishonorable one, rife with examples of heinous behavior that would make the likes of Ken Kratz blush. Their very necessity is now under question, as they seem to exist only to protect their own existence. Is it any wonder that people of quality avoid joining their ranks?
  7. Big_Joe
    Report Abuse
    Big_Joe - February 02, 2013 7:48 pm
    The silver lining.
  8. DriveThru
    Report Abuse
    DriveThru - February 02, 2013 5:06 pm
    Lawyers have been running our political economy since day one, and look what they've gotten us. With a few exceptions, fewer lawyers is a good thing! Maybe we'll get lucky, and most of them will relocate to China so they can be with their corporate owners.
  9. spooky tooth
    Report Abuse
    spooky tooth - February 02, 2013 12:28 pm
    or engineers, doctors, bankers, teachers? nobody ever retires or dies off. tell the kids to forget it.
  10. spooky tooth
    Report Abuse
    spooky tooth - February 02, 2013 11:36 am
    It's called Trickle Down and it will get us all.
  11. aspyder
    Report Abuse
    aspyder - February 02, 2013 10:25 am
    “A decrease in the number and quality of applicants prompts a 10 percent reduction in UW Law School admissions.”

    A decrease in the QUALITY of the applicants? The effects of Walker’s school cuts are showing up already?
  12. fldpwrman
    Report Abuse
    fldpwrman - February 02, 2013 9:33 am
    finally, some good news.
  13. Tmad
    Report Abuse
    Tmad - February 02, 2013 9:10 am
    supply and demand. Does the state of Wisconsin, between the two law schools, need to crank out 450 lawyers each and every year?
  14. jonathan
    Report Abuse
    jonathan - February 02, 2013 8:56 am
    Would that this article had gone a bit deeper and found source material in addition to the school's Advocate and dean.
    How about tracking the trajectory of rapidly increasing tuition as a deterrent to student admissions? Why not also explore the costs of the law school. including salaries, staffing levels and workload? In fairness, what's the level of state support been over time? Is this material?
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Connect With Us


Get daily Cap Times alerts

E-Mail:

First Name:

Last Name:


Vote!

Loading…

If you had to choose, which scenario would you prefer?

View Results