Paul Ryan on Wednesday said the federal government should stay out of the regulatory business when it comes to global warming.

“Climate change occurs no matter what,” said the Republican U.S. representative from Janesville. “The question is, can and should the federal government do something about it? And I would argue the federal government, with all its tax and regulatory schemes, can't.”

Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee and a potential Republican presidential contender, was speaking at a Christian Science Monitor event in Washington. He was responding to President Barack Obama's proposed restrictions on greenhouse emissions from coal plants. Ryan called those efforts "outside of the confines of the law."

“I don’t see a solution here,” Ryan said at the event. “I see an excuse to grow government, raise taxes and slow down economic growth.”

Ryan's statements come as the Obama administration mounted a vast effort to sell the proposed Environmental Protection Agency regulations.

"The Obama administration and its supporters fanned out around the country Tuesday to press the case for acting on climate change, arguing on the Hill, at packed Environmental Protection Agency hearings and in a new White House report that the price for doing nothing is far too high," read a Politico story on Wedensday.

The story points out that targeting climate change is seen by liberals as a winning political strategy leading up to Congressional elections in the fall, though "moderate Democrats struggle to defend President Barack Obama’s policies in key states that could flip the Senate in November."

The Obama administration, in a report issued this week, argues that inaction on climate change could cost $150 billion a year for efforts to mitigate carbon emmissions.

"It will come in the form of damage to public health and biodiversity, as well as physical impacts from rising seas and more severe storms, droughts and wildfires," says this story from Inside Climate News.

Democratic strategists are betting that the climate change initiative will resonate with women, young voters and enviromentalists.

"Not since the failed push to pass a cap-and-trade bill in Obama’s first term have the White House, congressional Democrats and their green allies mounted such a coordinated drive to sell an environmental policy," says Politico.

Ryan's comments also come in the wake of a House resolution to sue Obama over alleged abuse of his executive powers, a measure that Ryan said he supports. While the suit centers on the Obama administration's decision to waive the employer mandate for the Affordable Care Act, Republicans have pointed to a general misues of executive power.

"Republicans say their lawsuit was prompted by several instances where Obama has used executive action when he should have consulted Congress," reads this Washington Examiner story. "Examples include a recent decision to swap five Taliban prisoners held at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp for an Army soldier held captive in Afghanistan. Republican lawmakers believe Obama also overstepped his authority by implementing new rules to reduce pollution from coal plants and by stopping deportations of many young illegal immigrants."

Steven Elbow joined The Capital Times in 1999 and has covered law enforcement in addition to city, county and state government. He has also worked for the Portage Daily Register and has written for the Isthmus weekly newspaper in Madison.

You might also like

(8) comments

I lovewis
I lovewis

This argument should be over. The only reason to continue burning coal without cleaning it up is to preserve that industry. We can replace the lost jobs that go with that industry with jobs building and installing solar and wind. Solar an wind have become cost competitive with coal. ----- http://www.seia.org/blog/solar-wind-create-economic-benefits-nevada

Marv
Marv

I don't think Paul understands the entire climate change movement. It's all about cash in the pockets of those who portend to solve the problem. Can you say Solindra? Paul has his head in the right place but I wonder if he actually believes that those who are sounding the alarm are not doing so with pure profit motivation. That's what's happening now and historically. Al Gore did not become the first carbon billionaire for by accident.

BillS
BillS

I'm old enough to remember well the bitter debates about removing sulfur from power plant emissions. Utilities and the coal industry screamed they would go broke or have to raise electricity rates to prohibitive levels. But in the end, utilities were required to burn low sulfur coal, install scrubbers on emission stacks and retire old coal-fired plants. Guess what. None of those dire predictions happened. Once upon a time all gasoline contained lead; bad for health. Government regulations called for removal of lead from gas. Same wailing from the auto industry. Today, no lead. Both people and cars are better off. Paul Ryan was probably still in diapers when those debates were going on, so we can forgive him for that ignorance. But we can't forgive him for thinking he's smarter than virtually every scientist in the world. He knows less about science than he knows about economics, and that's hot much.

Marv
Marv

BillS: You have not been paying attention. Virtually every scientist in the world does not believe in all of this profiteering nonsense. In fact you may remember (I doubt it) a couple years back when some scientists were exposed as cooking the books on climate change for profit. Please, yes, climate change occurs. Yes, man may contribute to its advance. But Paul Ryan is absolutely correct in his assertions. The big difference is he's not trying make money off them.

WeNeedaDream
WeNeedaDream

Wish we would change our political climate.

Prairiewinds
Prairiewinds

“Climate change occurs no matter what,” said the Republican U.S. representative from Janesville.

Yes Paul, but there's no sane logic to exacerbating it or pretending climate change is not a serious problem.
Yes, your house is burning but ignoring it won't save your home and neither will throwing more oil on the fire. Either way, we lose our home.


Lewis
Lewis

Wonder what his science credentials are, when compared to leading, world-class scientists around the world, men and women who never have heard of a republican or democrat, and therefore do not define climate change in such a simplistic , political manor?

davea
davea

Robberies happen no matter what, so cops should only catch speeders?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Exchange ideas and opinions on posted articles. Don't promote products or services, impersonate other site users, register multiple accounts, threaten or harass others, post vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language. Don't post content that defames or degrades anyone. Don't repost copyrighted material; link to it. In other words, stick to the topic and play nice. Report abuses by clicking the button. Users who break the rules will be banned from commenting. We no longer issue warnings. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.