When the G-20 meets in Pittsburgh this week, French President Nicolas Sarkozy will urge world leaders to make two moves - one immediate and one long-term - that have the potential to temper capitalism's worst abuses and reassert human values at the national and international levels.

Sarkozy's aides say he will walk out of the summit of presidents and prime ministers from the world's most developed countries if the leaders fail to endorse a plan to curb bonuses for bankers.

That's the immediate demand. And it is an important one, as it could put the G-20 in the unusual position of trying to tame - rather than cheer on - the banksters and corporate CEOs who have so unsettled the global economy.

But even more important will be the http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jexJ6rodmKtChDY8J8j0j7vmnJlQD9AN6KO02"> French president's push to "revolutionize" international definitions of development, progress and achievement.

In recent decades, those measures have pretty much begun and ended with the bottom-line details of economic growth and wealth accumulation.

But Sarkozy says he wants to use the G-20 gathering as the launching point for a "fight" against what he describes as the "cult of figures" and the "cult of the market."

"A great revolution is waiting for us. For years, people said that finance was a formidable creator of wealth, only to discover one day that it accumulated so many risks that the world almost plunged into chaos," argues the French leader. "The crisis doesn't only make us free to imagine other models, another future, another world. It obliges us to do so."

Sarkozy's "revolution" would still use measures of economic growth and contraction in the analysis of a nation's success. But the definition would be expanded beyond traditional gross domestic product models to include measures of well-being and what Sarkozy describes as "the politics of civilization." These include environmental sustainability, the quality of public services, and the amount of time citizens of a country have to meet family responsibilities - which the French leader values as "personal services provided within a family circle."

Sarkozy, a conservative who was elected on a platform that promised to make the French economy more efficient and workers more productive, is not proposing some new-age fix for what ails the global economy. Rather, he is arguing that it is time to "refound" capitalism within what he describes as "moral" parameters in response to the now year-old global economic downturn and an equally serious decline in public confidence about the direction of nation states.

The broader measures are outlined in a report Sarkozy commissioned almost two years ago from a http://www.luiss.edu/category/20/shadow-g8-recommendations-jean-paul-fitoussi-and-joseph-stiglitz"> team of Nobel Prize-winning economists who have been critical of standard approaches to measuring the progress of nations. The group includes American Joseph Stiglitz and Indian Amartya Sen as well as Jean-Paul Fitoussi, the internationally respected president of the French Observatoire des Conjonctures Economiques.

The report from France's http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm">Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress proposes a global "statistical system which goes beyond commercial activity to measure personal well-being."

That's what Sarkozy will be talking about in Pittsburgh as the G-20 gathers. And he won't be alone. Stiglitz will be in the city as well, joining civil society leaders and activists to discuss the development models and measures at a http://www.ips-dc.org/events/peoples_voices_g20">Sept. 23 forum sponsored by The Nation, the Institute for Policy Studies and a coalition of grass-roots groups.

Says Stiglitz, "GDP is an attempt to measure one part of what is going on in our society which is market production. It is what I call GDP fetishism to think success in that part is success for the economy and for society."

http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/a-nobelist-distinguishes-progress-from-growth/"> Stiglitz, the former chief economist of the World Bank, argues: "While there is no single indicator that can capture something as complex as our society, the metrics commonly used, such as gross domestic product, suggest a trade-off: One can improve the environment only by sacrificing growth. But if we had a comprehensive measure of well-being, perhaps we would see this as a false choice."

Getting beyond false choices, contends the winner of the 2001 Nobel Prize for economics, will allow for sounder policymaking on the parts of governments and global groupings such as the G-20.

"What we measure affects what we do," explains Stiglitz. "If we have the wrong metrics, we will strive for the wrong things."

Using sounder measures will also increase the legitimacy of governments in the eyes of citizens, says Sarkozy.

That's a message that could resonate with at least some G-20 leaders, especially if the French president delivers it in http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sarkozy-proposes-the-ijoie-de-vivrei-index-1787221.html"> the terms he used in Paris recently.

"For years, the official figures have boasted of more and more economic growth," Sarkozy said at the Sorbonne. "It now appears that this growth, by placing the future of the planet in danger, destroys more than it creates. All over the world, people are convinced that we are lying to them, that the figures are false or, worse, faked. Nothing could be more damaging to democracy."

Sarkozy is so very right about this. The notion that democracy can flourish as a society where decisions are dictated by corporate marketing strategies and campaign contributions is antithetical to everything that the founders of the American experiment understood and intended.

It was not Nicolas Sarkozy, nor even Joseph Stiglitz, who first argued that nations must measure more than their GDPs when determining the characters.

Two hundred and thirty-three years ago, a young man who had imbibed heavily of the Enlightenment thinking of his day suggested that a good nation would concern itself with "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

Thomas Jefferson did not end there. He wrote in the American Declaration of Independence about the need to "institute (a) new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect (citizens') safety and happiness."

John Nichols is the associate editor of The Capital Times. He will participate in several G-20 events this week in Pittsburgh, among them a session where he will lead a dialogue with Joseph Stiglitz. jnichols@madison.com

You might also like

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Exchange ideas and opinions on posted articles. Don't promote products or services, impersonate other site users, register multiple accounts, threaten or harass others, post vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language. Don't post content that defames or degrades anyone. Don't repost copyrighted material; link to it. In other words, stick to the topic and play nice. Report abuses by clicking the button. Users who break the rules will be banned from commenting. We no longer issue warnings. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.