Judge to be asked to reconsider his wolf hunt ruling

2013-01-10T10:45:00Z Judge to be asked to reconsider his wolf hunt rulingJESSICA VANEGEREN | The Capital Times | jvanegeren@madison.com madison.com

While a Dane County judge may have ruled last Friday that dogs can be used to hunt wolves, but not trained to hunt them, that confusing decision has not settled the issue. 

In what will be an atypical legal move, the plaintiffs in the case plan to file a motion next week asking Dane County Circuit Judge Peter Anderson to essentially take another look at his decision and consider clarifying or changing his mind about it, according to Carl Sinderbrand, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs.

The move is akin to filing an appeal, but rather than asking a higher court judge to rule on a lower judge’s decision, the move allows the original judge to take a second look at his own ruling.

Sinderbrand says in his 30-plus-year career, he has filed such a motion about a dozen times.

“The notion is … if the judge made a mistake or the decision is unclear on an important point, state statute provides this procedure for the judge to take another crack at it,” Sinderbrand told me Wednesday.

As to what portion of the judge’s ruling needs clarifying, Sinderbrand wouldn’t yet say.

“I can’t give out that information yet,” he says. “We are still deciding on how we want to frame the motion.”

The state Department of Natural Resources and the judge are aware of Sinderbrand's plans. Anderson had not released his written decision as of Thursday, but the plaintiffs' motion does not preclude him from doing so.

The lawsuit was brought against the DNR and its board in August by animal welfare groups and individuals who claimed the state had insufficient rules in place to protect the safety of dogs involved in hunting wolves.

Wisconsin, which initiated a modern wolf hunt for the first time this past fall, is the only state in the country to allow the use of dogs for wolf hunting. However, the filing of the lawsuit led to a temporary injunction against their use.

The state went ahead with the hunt, which began Oct. 15 and was scheduled to run through February unless the quota was met early. The quota of 116 wolves was met early, with 117 actually killed — many through trapping — and the season was closed at 5 p.m. Dec. 23.

The state’s Native American tribes refused to participate in the hunt, citing spiritual connections to “brother wolf,” and declined to pursue their allotted share of the quota.

Despite the motion asking Anderson to reconsider his decision, the DNR is moving forward to both clarify its wolf hunting rules as well as revamp its entire wolf management plan, according to DNR attorney Tim Andryk.

He stressed the updated plan would include specifics on how and when dogs could be trained and said the public would be involved “quite a bit” in the process over the course of the next year, including the tribes and other stakeholders.

Andryk says the plan is to have the new rules and management plan in place by 2014, which means the training and use of dogs in the 2013 hunt remains a murky issue.

Copyright 2015 madison.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(9) Comments

  1. sarge
    Report Abuse
    sarge - January 13, 2013 10:16 am
    The dog bear hunters are widley considred to be the trailer trash meth heads of the hunting world
  2. sarge
    Report Abuse
    sarge - January 13, 2013 10:14 am
    wolves are just big dogs so i would like o petition for a dog hunting season under the equal protection clause. the dogs i would most like to hunt are wolf and bear hunting dogs so the DNR wouldn't even need to make a new season just combine them all
  3. swarley
    Report Abuse
    swarley - January 12, 2013 9:43 pm
    Just keep going back until you get the answer you want??ridiculous
  4. swarley
    Report Abuse
    swarley - January 12, 2013 9:41 pm
    more civility from the left
  5. reality22
    Report Abuse
    reality22 - January 11, 2013 5:11 pm
    Tricolor Dog....... You need to look up the word bigot in your webster! Sort of like looing in the mirror.....
  6. aspyder
    Report Abuse
    aspyder - January 10, 2013 6:42 pm
    The wolf hunt was highly successful in my opinion. And that was without dogs. I understand dogs and hunting in so far as birds are concerned, not only to flush but to retrieve. I just don't like the idea that dogs are used on bear and could be on wolves.
  7. TSEliot2012
    Report Abuse
    TSEliot2012 - January 10, 2013 1:21 pm
    ...and in related news, there is a group of animal rights activists who plans to hold a vigil for the killed wolves with candles, a bell ringing and a poem..., please.
  8. Tricolor Dog
    Report Abuse
    Tricolor Dog - January 10, 2013 12:32 pm
    Republicans are the animals in these discussions. Vile creatures that should be penned.
  9. reality22
    Report Abuse
    reality22 - January 10, 2013 12:07 pm
    No end to the litigation and tax dollars spent on an animal that has OVER a 100% chance of killing or maiming someones livestock or pet (on average) over its lifespan!
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

What's hot

Featured businesses

Get weekly ads via e-mail