The Senate has voted 68-32 for a comprehensive immigration reform bill that, while imperfect, provides a road forward for the United States on an issue that has vexed the country for far too long. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., voted to take that step forward, while Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., voted to maintain a current circumstance that almost everyone agrees is a mess.

We agree with Baldwin on this issue.

While she admits that this particular immigration reform measure is a compromise, the Democratic senator correctly observes: “This bipartisan solution fixes a broken system and will help families pursue and realize the American dream. Immigration is a vital part of our American story, and immigrants should continue to have the opportunity to help build a stronger future for themselves and our country.”

Specifically, Baldwin says, "The bipartisan Senate plan puts in place a pathway for earned citizenship for undocumented individuals who are currently here living in the shadows. The measure builds on our efforts to strengthen border security. It reduces our deficit over the next 10 years by $175 billion and by an additional $700 billion in the following 10 years. This plan provides our Wisconsin agriculture economy a stable, secure workforce.  And reform provides students who were brought to our country as children, who have worked hard to earn a high school diploma, the opportunity they deserve to contribute to their communities by attending college, serving in the military, or starting their career.”

Johnson gripes that even with this measure, “more illegal immigrants will come to this country.”

In fact, the measure that’s being considered will reduce the number of undocumented immigrants entering the country. Some will still come. But the numbers will be lower and Johnson and his colleagues should recognize this reality.

After leaving immigration issues unresolved for so long, the Congress really should not make the perfect the enemy of the good.

The good news is that Johnson is the outlier.

Prominent Republicans, including the party’s 2008 presidential nominee, Arizona Sen. John McCain, and a potential 2016 nominee, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, voted for reform.

If the pattern of strong Democratic support for reform combined with significant Republican backing continues in the House, the legislation will pass and it will be signed by the president.

Congressman Mark Pocan, D-Madison, is on board, saying: “Our nation has always been built on the concept of inclusion and openness, and I am pleased that the U.S. Senate today passed bipartisan and comprehensive immigration reform legislation. This bill takes important steps to ensure we can keep families together, have a road map to citizenship for new American immigrants, and that all workers are treated fairly. The time is now to act on a new, common-sense immigration process, and I urge the House to move on this matter as soon as possible.”

Congressman Ron Kind, D-La Crosse, and Congresswoman Gwen Moore, D-Milwaukee, should be “yes” votes.

The same goes for Congressman Paul Ryan, R-Janesville, who along with Rubio has been an outspoken backer of reform.

But other Republicans in the Wisconsin delegation may need some prodding.

We hope that they will take their counsel from 46 Wisconsin legislators who have made a rare and important bipartisan call for all members of Wisconsin’s congressional delegation to support immigration reform.

“We don’t have the luxury to wait for the perfect bill,” explains state Rep. Eric Genrich, D-Green Bay, an organizer of the effort. “The families in my Assembly district who continue to be divided by our irrational and burdensome immigration framework don’t have that luxury either. The time to act is now and I think the bill to pass is this one.”

The Wisconsin legislators offer a variety of perspectives on why the bill should be passed.

State Rep. JoCasta Zamarripa, a Democrat who represents much of Milwaukee’s burgeoning Latino population, says: “We know that reform will strengthen our economy, and strengthen our country’s future.”

State Rep. Jeff Stone, R-Greendale, says: “We can secure the borders, and in so doing, I think we’ll solve many problems that the federal government has allowed to be in existence for 30 years, but that we at the local and state level have to deal with.”

State Rep. Al Ott, R-Forest Junction, says: “Wisconsin agriculture is extremely dependent on immigrant labor. I really do think that it’s time for the federal government to get serious about immigration reform.”

The Wisconsin legislators are right. The immigration reform legislation that the House is considering is not perfect. But it has the potential to a great deal of good for Wisconsin families, for Wisconsin farms and for Wisconsin’s broader economy. And Ott really is right:  It is time for the Congress to get serious about immigration reform.

Share your opinion on this topic by sending a letter to the editor to Include your full name, hometown and phone number. Your name and town will be published. The phone number is for verification purposes only. Please keep your letter to 250 words or less.

You might also like

(7) comments


Lorax is right.

Current law makes employment of illegals a felony. If the President, or AG, directed every US attny to seriously prosecute one employer of illegals every month---they could find one in a couple of hours---the jobs would dry up and they would leave on their own.

It would cost a little more for food and landscaping, but would save millions in taxes for health care, education, and law enforcement.

Of course it would also require denying welfare to illegals..........

Several states have awakened and are taking similar action, and it works.


"Lorax is right."

Yup. You are too.


Start putting people in jail who hire illegal workers if you want to actually change the situation. Otherwise this continues to just be political posturing that will likely changes nothing at all.

"It reduces our deficit over the next 10 years by $175 billion and by an additional $700 billion in the following 10 years."



Immigration reform DOES NOT require new laws just a new occupant in the White House. Baldwin voted for amnesty and should be recalled. Immigration is a mess because the current white house occupant violates the oath of office by not enforcing the law. The Senate bill has the loopholes in it so that he can continue to violate his oath of office.


Immigration reform requires new members of the House. The party of rich white men wants brown skinned people to work for next to nothing, but it will never allow them to vote.


So bookman is on record as saying he wants illegal immigrants to not only get minimum wage or better but be able to vote too. You are representative of the collective intelligence that resides in the dumb party.


"Baldwin ... should be recalled."

Go ahead. By now everyone knows how it's done. Give it your best shot.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Exchange ideas and opinions on posted articles. Don't promote products or services, impersonate other site users, register multiple accounts, threaten or harass others, post vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language. Don't post content that defames or degrades anyone. Don't repost copyrighted material; link to it. In other words, stick to the topic and play nice. Report abuses by clicking the button. Users who break the rules will be banned from commenting. We no longer issue warnings. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.