Wisconsin Congressmen Paul Ryan and Sean Duffy do not earn all that much praise from this quarter. But we are delighted to deliver it when it’s due. And both Republican representatives get high marks for joining Democrats in voting to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act.

The measure passed the House this week by a 286-38 margin, completing a long and difficult process in which, as Wisconsin Congressman Mark Pocan noted, “common sense has prevailed.”

There were a number of Republican members of the House who objected to strengthening VAWA, which now includes strong protections for same-sex couples, Native Americans, immigrants and college students.

We are disappointed that Wisconsin Republicans Reid Ribble of Sherwood, Tom Petri of Fond du Lac and Jim Sensenbrenner of Menomonee Falls sided with opponents of the bill, as did Republican Sen. Ron Johnson.

But, along Ryan, Duffy and Pocan, Rep. Ron Kind, D-La Crosse, voted “yes,” as did Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Madison.

And, of course, Congresswoman Gwen Moore, the Milwaukee Democrat who championed reauthorization of the VAWA, cast an especially enthusiastic “yes” vote.

Moore was one of several House members who fought back when Republicans tried to pass a weaker version of VAWA. Along with Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., and Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., she introduced the Senate version of the bill, which was ultimately approved. In addition to extending protections to LGBT, Native American and immigrant victims, the Senate version — approved by senators 78-22 — provides for more rape kits, includes a national registry of forensic evidence from sexual assault cases, strengthens anti-trafficking statutes, provides for temporary housing for victims, and addresses domestic violence on college campuses.

In introducing the Senate bill on Feb. 26, Moore had criticized House Republicans: “Their bill title may say VAWA, but it is far from the Senate bill that works to protect all victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking and human trafficking and passed with a strong bipartisan vote. Today I joined Representatives Conyers and Slaughter to introduce the real VAWA — the Senate VAWA.”

We’re pleased that the majority of the Wisconsin delegation, Democrats and Republicans, agreed with Moore and stood with her on the right side of history.

Share your opinion on this topic by sending a letter to the editor to tctvoice@madison.com. Include your full name, hometown and phone number. Your name and town will be published. The phone number is for verification purposes only. Please keep your letter to 250 words or less.

You might also like

(3) comments


@nav I think the problem with the capital times is not that they are critical of all republicans all the time. They are a progressive newspaper and have progressive views... No problem here. I think the problem is when they bypass criticism of Democrats for issues that they blast republicans for... Raising large campaign amounts especially and raising money from out of state are two such issues.


The Neo Con movement in this country, akin to the Catholic Center Party in Weimar, is as nationalist as the social democrat Democrat Party, both extolling national social police power over Constitutional reservation of general police power in the States, the constant demand for amendment to enable national power an obvious example. The issue at the Federal level is not violence against women, but violence against the Constitution in the demogoguery to enlist women in a partisan/chauvinist drive to pre-empt the States of well settled jurisdiction in major social matters like the policing of women and marriage. Separations of power, its exercise, are the issue here, suffering not even the inappropriate use of a label projecting more than law permits; even the substance of the measure contributing to erode proper understanding, and there to deference to exisitng State due process and equal protection. Can we figure why Ryan and Duff support?


This is a good example of how the CAP times is not always critical of Republicans. It depends on their positions.

While I also appreciate Ryan and Duff's vote, I am not so sure that they voted so because they TRULY believe in the bill OR because it was a political safe thing to do in their district. I am inclined to believe it is the latter.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Exchange ideas and opinions on posted articles. Don't promote products or services, impersonate other site users, register multiple accounts, threaten or harass others, post vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language. Don't post content that defames or degrades anyone. Don't repost copyrighted material; link to it. In other words, stick to the topic and play nice. Report abuses by clicking the button. Users who break the rules will be banned from commenting. We no longer issue warnings. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.