tom oates

Tom Oates: Packers' loss is no gain with Adrian Peterson coming

2012-12-31T01:00:00Z 2013-01-25T21:14:46Z Tom Oates: Packers' loss is no gain with Adrian Peterson comingTOM OATES | Wisconsin State Journal | | 608-252-6172

MINNEAPOLIS — In the end, the anti-bye faction among Green Bay Packers fans got what they wanted.

Adrian Peterson.

For a third time.

But is trying to stop the NFL’s best running back after failing to do that twice this season really what the Packers wanted to open the playoffs? Especially after they flubbed a chance to secure a first-round bye with their 37-34 loss to Peterson and the Minnesota Vikings on Sunday at the Metrodome?

We’ll find out soon because the Packers and Vikings will meet again in the opening round of the playoffs Saturday night at Lambeau Field. That’s a short turnaround for the Packers to figure out how to stop Peterson, who rushed for 199 yards Sunday, ran for 210 in an earlier meeting and finished the season with 2,097, the second-highest total in NFL history.

“Adrian’s a great player,” nose tackle B.J. Raji said. “We had opportunities and we didn’t cash in on them in a close divisional game with your opponent fighting for their lives. We came up short. Sometimes that’s how it goes in this league, but the good news is we get another shot next week.”

Be careful what you wish for, B.J., because the Vikings are 4-0 since suffering a 23-14 loss to the Packers on Dec. 2 at Lambeau and have become a formidable team using an old-school approach of running the ball and dominating the lines of scrimmage.

Sure, the Vikings were the more desperate team Sunday, needing the victory to qualify for the playoffs while the NFC North Division champion Packers were merely playing for a seed. The Vikings will lose that edge in the playoff game because both teams will be desperate, but they have proven in two games that they match up well with the Packers. Green Bay probably would have lost the first meeting had not young Vikings quarterback Christian Ponder thrown two ill-advised interceptions.

The Packers had hoped to bury the Vikings on Sunday because they didn’t want to play a team three times in a month. Instead, they emerged with a bring-on-the-Vikings mentality.

Asked if the Packers were looking forward to the rematch, Raji said, “I think I speak for everybody when I say, ‘Yes.’ Any time you let a tough game like this go, you know it’s going to bring up some bad feelings, but we’ve got to move on and learn from it.”

What the Packers learned is they need to match the Vikings’ intensity from the start. They fell behind 13-0 before they decided to play.

What followed was one of the more entertaining NFL games in this or any season, a back-and-forth affair that could be repeated in six days. Many of the Packers said they want the rematch to start sooner than that.

“Oh, no doubt,” tight end Jermichael Finley said. (We’d play them) in the backyard, if we had to. But we’ve got to come out and jump on them at the beginning. We can’t let them hang around and get three (points) there, six there. We’ve just got to put our foot on their throat ASAP.”

The Packers’ confidence is based on several things. First, the game will be played outdoors in Green Bay. Second, they believe they didn’t play a bad game Sunday, they just started too slowly. And third, they’ve been down this road before, having emerged from the wild card weekend to win the Super Bowl two years ago.

Despite the loss, the Packers locker room was surprisingly upbeat after the game.

“The opportunity to get the bye does not exist anymore, so the playoffs start now,” coach Mike McCarthy said. “We know what the bye looks like, we know what this position looks like, so it’s time to kick it forward to playoff football. It’s as simple as that. We’re disappointed we lost today, but at the end of the day there’s six NFC teams left and we’re going to line up and play at home at Lambeau Field in front of our crowd. That’s what we’re excited about.”

Though the game was a setback for the Packers, it was not a signal that something is terribly amiss. True, the Vikings pass rushers took advantage of their revamped offensive line at times, but that often happens in games at the Metrodome. And, yes, the Packers failed to get a pass rush on Ponder and allowed him to convert too many third-down plays.

If there is a real worry, however, it is that the Packers geared up to stop Peterson and still couldn’t do it. Fortunately, there is only one Peterson in the NFL. Unfortunately, he will be in Green Bay on Saturday.

“It’s important to take away the focal point of any team’s best player and obviously we didn’t do that today,” McCarthy said. “We’ll go back, grade it and get ready to go. I look for us to have a better performance on defense against Adrian Peterson.”

The Packers’ still-promising season depends on it.

“I think he probably might have won the (NFL) MVP today,” quarterback Aaron Rodgers said, “and hopefully we can win the playoff game next week.”

Maybe so, but a bye would have been preferable to another date with Peterson and the Vikings.

Contact Tom Oates at or 608-252-6172.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(12) Comments

  1. Renaissance Man
    Report Abuse
    Renaissance Man - December 31, 2012 11:18 am
    Skol Vikings!!!
  2. rockemred
    Report Abuse
    rockemred - December 31, 2012 9:41 am
    Can you believe the fools blasting Rodgers, I guess they want him to throw it into coverage, his ability to buy time long out weighs his holding on the ball to long. A.P. is the beast that everyone knew he was, Williams did look timid more than once, Brad Jones got ran over three times, A.J. Hawk looked as though he was in cement when Peterson caught the T.D. pass. Time to bring the safety up closer to the box to protect the edges (where A.P.) was able to break off the long ones. That game could of went wither way, Green Bay will have to match intensity from the get go. The Vikes played well no doubt, but so did the Pack, should be a wild one again at Lambeau.
  3. Booke
    Report Abuse
    Booke - December 31, 2012 8:31 am
    I agree with parts of retired and ballblaster. First of all.. I know cheddar land hates to admit it but Rodgers does hold the ball too long causing sacks. That's why he has such a good TD/ int ratio. Travon Williams ought to be benched for not even trying to tackle. Pathetic!!
  4. Lionhear
    Report Abuse
    Lionhear - December 31, 2012 8:30 am
    You got that right, Tramon Williams refused to attempt a tackle on Peterson on a play in the second half. He should sit and let those willing to stick their noses into a tackle play in his place.
  5. Lionhear
    Report Abuse
    Lionhear - December 31, 2012 8:24 am
    Greg Jennings presence is beginning to be felt after his return from injury.h He played very well yesterday, especially running after the catch. Hope he stays in Green Bay.
  6. retired
    Report Abuse
    retired - December 31, 2012 7:19 am
    Tom, how come no mention of the pathetic play of Williams. If I were the coach, that idiot would be running his butt off today. Just to remind him of what stupid plays effect the entire game.
  7. retired
    Report Abuse
    retired - December 31, 2012 7:12 am
    I hate to say this, but if they aren't stopping Peterson, they may be one and done come next week.
  8. Ballblaster
    Report Abuse
    Ballblaster - December 31, 2012 6:44 am
    Rodgers brings on about 40% of the Sacks himself.
  9. Ballblaster
    Report Abuse
    Ballblaster - December 31, 2012 6:43 am
    McCarthy is a good Coach; we have a tremendous would you like a 3-13 or 2-12 such as Vikings experience. Packers are the Best.
  10. RecessionSux
    Report Abuse
    RecessionSux - December 31, 2012 4:49 am
    So we've only been watching Aaron Rodgers getting constantly sacked for two years now. Does any of our coaching staff care that the goose that throws the golden egg is always laying down?
  11. RichardSRussell
    Report Abuse
    RichardSRussell - December 31, 2012 4:08 am
    There's only one Adrian Peterson, just like there's only one Calvin Johnson. They're both awesome individual performers. Unfortunately for the Lions and VIkings, it's still a team sport.

    The worrisome part of that observation is that the Packers are like 1.3-dimensional on offense themselves. Yes, I rank Aaron Rodgers right up there in awesomeness, but he can't do it all by himself. Here's hoping he doesn't HAVE to.
  12. anonconcom
    Report Abuse
    anonconcom - December 31, 2012 2:54 am
    Wow, the Packers really stink. Any chance they'll finally get rid of loser McCarthy? He gets so much praise but when you look at him week-to-week you see him make so many poor decisions. Pretty sad.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured businesses

Get weekly ads via e-mail



How far will the Badgers men's basketball team get this season?

View Results
Daily sports email alerts

Don't miss a moment of local high school athletics.

Don't miss a moment of UW athletics.