CHICAGO — Legends and Leaders?


The Big Ten Conference divisions look more like Legends and Losers now.

The geographically challenged football alignments the Big Ten so painstakingly pieced together don't look quite as even now that Penn State has been busted by the NCAA for covering up the atrocities committed by former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky. The Nittany Lions' sudden fall has created short- and long-term competitive-balance issues for the conference.

In the Leaders Division, traditional powers Ohio State and Penn State are on NCAA probation and therefore ineligible for the Big Ten title game (the Buckeyes for one year, the Nittany Lions for four). With Purdue, Illinois and Indiana combining for a 26-70 conference record the past four years, the division title and a return to the Big Ten title game has virtually been ceded to the University of Wisconsin.

That's good for the Badgers but bad for the Big Ten.

The imbalance is a sore subject with some people in the loaded Legends, especially this year when six of its teams are eligible for the title game compared to only four in the Leaders. Most appear willing to live with that for one year, though things might not improve much if Penn State is decimated for years by the harsh sanctions imposed by the NCAA.

"The only thing I can tell you is this is such an unbelievable circumstance," Michigan coach Brady Hoke said Thursday at the Big Ten Media Days event. "You wouldn't see this coming. But at the same time, life's not fair. And whether it's fair or not, it doesn't matter. We have a schedule to play."

But make no mistake. In the Legends, where five teams are considered contenders, the current setup is considered unfair.

Northwestern coach Pat Fitzgerald went so far Thursday as to propose having the Legends winner make the title game and the other participant be chosen from among the other eligible teams by a committee of the 12 athletic directors plus commissioner Jim Delany. Some thought Fitzgerald was joking, but he confirmed he was dead serious — so serious he presented the proposal to his athletic director.

Fitzgerald has less chance of his idea being enacted than Indiana does of winning the Big Ten, but his reaction showed people think some schools are benefitting more than others from the NCAA troubles of Ohio State and Penn State.

"As a coach, you think about those things," Fitzgerald said.

Of course, you would hate to overreact to a short-term situation. Ohio State will be eligible for the Big Ten title game next year and the Buckeyes are expected to be as strong as ever under coach Urban Meyer despite the NCAA sanctions he inherited from Jim Tressel.

So it all depends on Penn State. If first-year coach Bill O'Brien can keep the Nittany Lions competitive despite a four-year bowl ban, having his scholarships capped at 65 and potentially losing players under relaxed transfer rules, this won't be a huge issue. But if Penn State sinks, the Big Ten will take on a seriously lopsided look.

Citing USC's quick rebound from NCAA probation, Meyer said, "I think Penn State's going to bounce back a lot faster than you think." However, the situations aren't the same. USC had its scholarships reduced to 75, not 65, and had more talent. Even Delany admitted Penn State's penalties "will inhibit competitiveness for awhile."

It's likely Penn State's name and in-state recruiting power will keep it from falling off the map. But the Nittany Lions won't be a contender, either. So unless Purdue or Illinois comes on fast, the Leaders will be UW, Ohio State and not much else.

Adding a ninth conference game could alleviate the problem, but Delany shot down that proposal after discussing it with the athletic directors. And since Delany virtually eliminated any chance for realignment earlier in the week, it means the Big Ten is going to be unbalanced, possibly for years.

Many considerations went into the division alignment, but biggest was splitting evenly the four national brands — Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan and Nebraska. Since Penn State has forfeited that status for the immediate future, taking a look at realignment is a good idea.

Maybe the Big Ten could be realigned along East-West lines like it should have been all along.

Contact Tom Oates at or 608-252-6172.

You might also like

(5) comments


A really silly column focusing on an even sillier idea. UWBadger91 got it exactly right: to re-allign the entire conference would be an "over-reaction." You don't want to make changes just for the sake of making changes and this would be a change just a year or two after the announcement of divisions. That would make the conference look silly. Most of the national pundits don't realize that PSU has not been a real factor in the Big 10 championship since they've joined. UW has a stellar record, in comparison, and is now a "cornerstone" program. Wisconsin will have plenty of competition from Purdue this year and next year OSU is eligible again. Iowa, Michigan and Nebraska have all been in decline in the other side of the conference too, something that this notion seems to miss. These things tend to be cyclical in nature so so need to jump on the change wagon.


Badgers got the short end to begin with - how they could not be in a division with Iowa and Nebraska is beyond me. Those 3 would have rivalries that rival Michigan-Ohio State.


uwbadger91: You are absolutely correct. The entire point of this article is refudiated by the author in his own words when he says, and I quote "Of course, you would hate to overreact to a short term situation." So which way is it , Mr Oates?

I truly believe that I have been made dumber by having read this article.


Great Article Tom. This realignment needs to be done. It was screwed up from the beginning. Losing Iowa, Northwestern for Indiana, Purdue made no sense. A geographical alignment makes the most sense, especially with Penn State down for at least the next 10-12 years. Will it happen, probably not as Delany seems to have his ego invested in the original alignment and goes through a song and dance that you have to look at the long perspective. Ah Jim you have stated that your staff developed the divisional split from the time when PSU joined the league, which was 20 years ago, so that is somewhat double speak as their victories from '99 have now been wiped out. Solution: put MSU and Michigan back in the East and move ILL and UW to the West. Just do it and quit stroking your ego Jim Delaney. We all know that you can make figures do what you want and the premise was to seperate those with National Championships (Neb, OSU, Mich, and PSU) Penn State is now out of the picture and will be for the forseeable future. If they went to regional alignment UW's protected crossover game could be OSU or Michigan with MSU, PSU added in on a rotation basis. The other item that needs to be addressed is the addition of more conference games but again Delany shot that down as the coaches and AD's have now changed their minds despite the fans clamoring for an upgrade in opponents and all the other leagues going to nine conference games. Again great article


When considering reallignment, lets not forget history. It wasn't too many years ago that Wisconsin was considered a light-weight (I was a student on campus during the Don Morton era) and Michigan State wasn't much better. Now they're considered elite programs. Before Ohio State went on it's run of dominance from 2005 through 2009, look at the Big Ten Champions. Northwestern and Purdue tied in 2000, Illinois and Iowa in 2001, Iowa tied Michigan in 2003. Big Ten teams have proven they can surprise you. Urban Meyer has 2 national championships and coached Florida to 3 SEC titles. Anyone think he won't have success at Ohio State? Yes, this year's penalties against Ohio State and Penn State give Wisconsin an advantage. This year. But to reallign the entire conference due to this would be an over-reaction. The bottom line is, "To be the best, you've got to beat the best." The good news is whether you're in the Legends or Leaders division, each team controls it's own destiny. Just win and it's a mute point.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Exchange ideas and opinions on posted articles. Don't promote products or services, impersonate other site users, register multiple accounts, threaten or harass others, post vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language. Don't post content that defames or degrades anyone. Don't repost copyrighted material; link to it. In other words, stick to the topic and play nice. Report abuses by clicking the button. Users who break the rules will be banned from commenting. We no longer issue warnings. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.