Chris Rickert: Should UW be backing ALICE?

2012-10-06T07:00:00Z Chris Rickert: Should UW be backing ALICE?CHRIS RICKERT | Wisconsin State Journal | | 608-252-6198

When I read that a UW-Madison-based think tank had created a "partial antidote" to conservative policy pusher American Legislative Exchange Council, my first thought was that a lot of people would say liberals already have an antidote to ALEC. It's called the American university.

Academia as a den of leftists is a Republican talking point, bolstered by a handful of studies confirming university types are indeed more liberal and Democratic than the population at large.

But professors' political preferences only matter if they use their positions to give their politics a boost — especially if they're boosting them at taxpayer-funded universities such as UW-Madison.

The political preferences of the professor who created the anti-ALEC — called the American Legislative and Issue Campaign Exchange, or ALICE — are pretty clear.

Center on Wisconsin Strategy director Joel Rogers has helped found or manage a number of progressive organizations, serves as a contributing editor at leftist The Nation magazine and has garnered unflattering attention from the right-wing talkers.

Rogers doesn't accept the notion that ALICE and even ALEC are political advocacy organizations. They just offer model legislation, he said.

And he calls both ALICE — described on its website as a "public library of progressive state and local law" — and COWS — usually considered a left-leaning outfit — as "absolutely within the mainstream of the University of Wisconsin."

Consummate UW-Madison critic state Rep. Steve Nass, R-Whitewater, would probably agree with that.

Nass, the chairman of the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities, is known for his digs at the alleged liberalism of the Madison campus. His spokesman, Mike Mikalsen, contended COWS and other university-housed centers regularly do research and push issues for Democrats.

The notion that there's a need to create ALICE as a counterweight to ALEC is "kind of hilarious," he said. "ALEC is actually outgunned."

Still, COWS' only formal support from the university comes in its tax status. As a center at a nonprofit university, COWS is eligible for grants awarded to nonprofits, Rogers said. COWS' costs are covered by the governmental and nongovernmental grants and other non-state money, said Rogers and Maria Cancian, associate dean in the College of Letters and Science.

I asked the head of the Senate committee on the UW System, Kathleen Vinehout — a Democrat, yes, but not of the rabidly liberal variety — if ALICE is a political group being improperly propped up by a public university.

"I think we don't know the answer to your question," Vinehout said, adding ALICE will bear monitoring.

She said she'd like to see more UW-Madison experts at the Capitol advising lawmakers with nonpartisan, evidence-based research. In short, more of the Wisconsin Idea.

"We need the university be a real partner," she said, in finding "truth with a capital T."

No doubt. The capital Ds and Rs are much less critical.

Contact Chris Rickert at 608-252-6198 or, as well as on Facebook and Twitter (@ChrisRickertWSJ). His column appears Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. WI_Expat
    Report Abuse
    WI_Expat - October 06, 2012 4:30 pm
    It's hugely apparent that all the liberal argument about having a national group writing template legislation local or state governments as being wrong only applies to their opponents.

    The "evil ALEC" this "immoral ALEC" that now applies to ALICE just the same with one major difference, ALEC is donor based while ALICE is creating legislation off of public money grants...grants that a large percentage of the taxpayer "donors" disagree with the intentions of ALICE.

    In the case of the University of Wisconsin involvement....ALICE is hiding behind the shroud of academia but more significant, the UW finally exposes its own bias that was never easily hidden from public view for several decades.
  2. leftside
    Report Abuse
    leftside - October 06, 2012 1:05 pm
    I love how the poorly trained "journalist" Rickert makes his points by using tired talking points. ALEC is "conservative", the Nation is "leftist". Vinehout is not "rabidly liberal". So if you are a part of a liberal cause or group you are rabid or leftist indicating you are extreme. If on the right side you are simply conservative. Chris, I don't know why they pay you, you are one of the worst, pathetic excuses for a columnist I have ever read. Doing nothing more than pandering to your parent anti-union company, and the right wing. No wonder myself and many others have cancelled our subscriptions and the paper is struggling to survive. It won't, and one of the reasons is your writing.
  3. JAFO
    Report Abuse
    JAFO - October 06, 2012 11:54 am
    So which Republicans find ALEC "something to watch" like Vineout the Democrat says about ALICE?
  4. number6
    Report Abuse
    number6 - October 06, 2012 8:05 am
    'Taxpayer-funded university' is now nearly anachronistic, although many don't realize it. 'How much' does 20% 'buy' us these days?
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate your subscription and gain access to a whole new world

What's hot

Vote! Today's poll


Do you think we will get any more snow this season?

View Results