The next University of Wisconsin System president could make nearly $600,000 under a proposal being considered by the Board of Regents.

It’s one of several university administrative hires in line for dramatic, double-digit pay increases over their predecessors in the coming years, according to the plan.

“There is a need to have market-competitive salary ranges to attract high-quality applicants for these key leadership positions,” according to the policy document explaining the changes.

To faculty and staff chronically underpaid compared with national peers, the proposal comes as a mixed bag.

“While I’m not thrilled that the Regents would do that for only top administrators, if it’s the start of a process of reviewing salary ranges for everyone, that’s great,” said Russell Dimond, a UW-Madison computing specialist who chairs a committee of academic staffers looking at policy and budgets.

The proposal would update salary ranges for top System officials and campus leaders based on peers nationally, shifting the midrange salary targets up an average of 17.5 percent. It also would significantly expand the pay ranges both up and down so Regents could consider a new campus leader’s experience level and the size and complexity of the job.

Under the updated ranges, pay for existing administrators wouldn’t immediately change provided they fall within the new ranges. New hires would benefit most.

Outgoing System president Kevin Reilly’s job would see a 25 percent bump in midrange pay. He makes $418,000 annually. His replacement would be paid between $399,000 and $598,500.

The new UW-Madison provost, expected to be hired in the next year, would see the highest bump, up 39 percent. Outgoing provost Paul DeLuca makes just more than $291,000. His successor would make between $295,369 and $443,053.

Regents president Michael Falbo said the ranges for some top administrative jobs haven’t been reviewed or adjusted in years, a result of the Regents taking a case-by-case approach to setting salaries as new jobs have come open.

“We’ve been doing this on a one-by-one basis,” he said. “It’s not an appropriate way to carry it out in the long run. We decided to review all the ranges.”

In some cases, such as when UW-Madison and UW-Eau Claire were hiring new chancellors last year, the Regents moved to update the pay ranges based on what similar universities pay their leaders nationally. It resulted in new UW-Madison chancellor Rebecca Blank earning a starting salary of $495,000, a huge raise over interim chancellor David Ward’s salary of about $366,500.

Currently, Regents pay new top administrators under a range determined by picking a midpoint salary of others in similar jobs at similar institutions nationally. They’re allowed to pay the new hire between 90 percent and 110 percent of the midpoint.

The new policy would broaden that range to between 80 percent and 120 percent. It also calls for reviewing and adjusting those ranges every two years.

“There’s never been a regular calendar by which we bring those updated ranges to the board,” said System spokesman David Giroux. “It’s been updated piecemeal over the years.”

Falbo said the proposal is one step in a larger goal to make salaries more competitive for employees of all rungs across the sprawling 26-campus system. Faculty and staff salaries significantly lag their peers nationally and a 1 percent raise this year did little to close the gap.

Regents have a somewhat limited role in the overall salary picture, being able to set salaries only for a select group of top administrators. Chancellors at some campuses, including UW-Madison, have passed measures in recent years to provide pay bumps for top-performing faculty. Other employees in the university system fall under state employee categories, getting raises only when other state employees do.

The Board of Regents will meet Thursday and Friday at UW-Parkside in Kenosha.

  • Reporter, Wisconsin State Journal

You might also like

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Post a comment

gorman
gorman

You get what you pay for. Top of the line Universities pay top of the line salaries (usually). What hospital CEO would work for 400k?

Bucky47
Bucky47

How much do our football and basketball coach make?!?
Ohh yeah way more-interesting priorities we have.

magnum1
magnum1

$600,000 a year?. Nobody is worth that much money in todays economey. That just goes to show us all that money rules this world today! Give me a break!

davea
davea

Where do you live in "this world today"?

koala
koala

Meanwhile, UW-Madison faculty are paid 12% below the median of their counterparts at peer institutions, and near the bottom of the Big Ten.

Inflation in the salaries and numbers of administrators is the biggest force driving up the cost of education at UW-Madison, except for the continuing drop in the share of costs borne by the State.

I don't begrudge the President of the UW System the money (though the bureaucracy associated with the System is HUGELY bloated), but I do begrudge the regents doing NOTHING about the ongoing crisis of low faculty and staff salaries. What good is going to do to have a princely salary for the System prez if many of the best researchers and teachers have departed due to years of abuse?

joe
joe

If UW pays the top dollar they need to raise the expectations and if they are not met, they kick them out and get a new one. Just like the private sector. The problem is that not many people expect much from any public sector institution so they put up with slackers.

madcitydude
madcitydude

check out the salaries of lower level administrators at the uw and see what kind of raises they have already received from the critical compensation last year. funny how there's never any money until a big wig needs a raise.

Crow Barr
Crow Barr

I'm thinking Dad was right when he said it pays to get a good education!

Worked for me, should work for UW staff too.

badger313
badger313

Something the WSJ neglects to mention is that $600,000 would still be less than what the presidents of the universities of Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan, Iowa, Ohio State, etc. receive. It's also a fraction of what a a CEO managing a private firm of similar size would likely receive.

deernut00
deernut00

Something really not right about this. I wonder what it is that smells so bad. Any ideas?

ArchieBunkersKidBrother
ArchieBunkersKidBrother

Perhaps you should bathe more often?

Frank Rojas
Frank Rojas

I hope that extra 25% buys somebody 1000% better than Reilly. He was an epic failure without and original good idea.(But plenty of bad ones)

JAlfredPrufrock
JAlfredPrufrock

Agreed.