Scott Walker: Budget returns Medicaid to 'intended purpose as a safety net'

2013-02-20T19:20:00Z Scott Walker: Budget returns Medicaid to 'intended purpose as a safety net'DAVID WAHLBERG | Wisconsin State Journal | | 608-252-6125

Medicaid would return to its “intended purpose as a safety net for the neediest” by shifting some people off the program, adding others and refusing the full expansion allowed under federal law, according to Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed budget for 2013-15.

The budget would also boost spending for mental health, rural health, nursing homes and a statewide medical imaging project at UW-Madison.

Walker plans to shift 87,000 parents with incomes above the poverty level — $11,490 a year for a single person — from Medicaid to a federal exchange, a government-subsidized private insurance market starting next year. The coverage would cost them about $19 a month, plus co-pays and deductibles.

Walker would let 82,000 childless adults with incomes under the poverty level gain Medicaid coverage.

His proposal would cut $17 million through Medicaid program changes but increase state funding for Medicaid by $664 million because of routine cost increases, federal cuts and new requirements.

Overall, the exchange — which Walker opposed, along with other parts of the federal health care law — would help reduce the state’s uninsured population by nearly half, to about 253,000 people, according to the budget.

But Democrats and health care advocates say the budget would leave more people uninsured, leading to higher state costs.

“A significant percentage of them just aren’t going to be able to afford the cost-sharing of the exchange,” said Jon Peacock, research director of the Wisconsin Council on Children and Families.

The state could save $254 million through 2020 by fully expanding Medicaid, according to a Legislative Fiscal Bureau report last week. The federal government would pay the full cost of adding about 175,000 people through 2017, after which funding would drop to 90 percent.

Rep. Jon Richards, D-Milwaukee, said Walker’s decision to reject additional Medicaid dollars means “health care is going to become a lot more expensive, and it may become unobtainable.”

But Walker said the deal is too risky for the state, which typically pays about 40 percent of Medicaid expenses, with the federal government picking up the rest.

“If they cannot fulfill their current obligations, what makes us think the Congress and administration can cover even bigger costs in the future when they are sitting on a $16.5 trillion debt?” Walker asked.

Walker’s budget also would:

• Provide about $30 million more for mental health services, including $12.5 million for two more treatment units at Mendota Health Institute.

• Invest $20 million in rural access to health care, including $7.4 million for Medical College of Wisconsin campuses in Green Bay and Wausau.

• Increase reimbursements to nursing homes by $10.4 million, or about $26 million overall.

• Give $3.75 million to the Wisconsin Oncology Network of Imaging Excellence, an effort by the UW Carbone Cancer Center to expand imaging services at 17 sites around the state.

— State Journal reporter Dee J. Hall contributed to this report.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. I_Agree
    Report Abuse
    I_Agree - February 22, 2013 10:10 am
    Of course the OP has Master Shake as his icon. Go Badgers!
    However, in case you actually read the article, this plan will reduce the uninsured number of people and it will create a competitive marketplace for insurance plans for people with an income above the poverty level. Mind you, the poverty level is the equivalent of making $11/hr working 20 hours per week. Or, $5.50 (below minimum wage) for a normal persons 40 work week. All this is doing is saying get any kind of remedial job and you will be in a better place with a private insurance plan. It is one step in the direction of bettering yourself and being more independent and not relying on what the government is giving you. Basically, more choice in life.
    Also, people will still qualify for medicaid. So far, our federal "budget" has only created debt and since Walker took over our state budget has created a surplus. A five year old can tell you which one is better.
    - 29 year old college graduate just trying to create a life for his family through hard work, something lost on our generation.
  2. Thurston Howell III
    Report Abuse
    Thurston Howell III - February 21, 2013 7:43 am
    Please give us a credible citation for any reported instance in which people have died "in the streets with Randian Sociopaths stepping over the body with nary a though (sic)".

    Don't have any? I didn't think so.

    The only people who "die in the streets" are those who live in the streets by choice.
  3. Shake
    Report Abuse
    Shake - February 20, 2013 9:30 pm
    Every industrialized country IN THE WORLD covers all of their citizens. Only in America can people die in the streets with Randian Sociopaths stepping over the body with nary a though. What a sad, small people we've become.
  4. firefightn15
    Report Abuse
    firefightn15 - February 20, 2013 7:43 pm
    This seems like a sound and cautious plan. We do have the federal carrot hanging in front of us but without knowing how long it would be federally funded and the state having to pick up the full tab, that carrot is just that...a carrot.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate your subscription and gain access to a whole new world

What's hot

Vote! Today's poll


Do you think we will get any more snow this season?

View Results
You might also like