The State Journal's call for more charter schools in the editorial welcoming the president to Madison was a bit off the mark.

A charter school is not an end in itself - it's a means to achieve an end. If there are impediments to learning that we're unable to address, or opportunities for improvement that we're unable to provide through our neighborhood schools, then a charter could be an effective way to address the issue

For example, I'd be interested in a charter proposal designed to attack our achievement gap by providing a more intense academic focus in a longer school day and longer school year for students who are behind. But if a charter idea lacks that sort of vital justification, then for me there's insufficient reason to deviate from our traditional neighborhood school approach.

The same is true for the school district's recently-adopted strategic plan. More charter schools is not a goal, it's a strategy. If charters can be an effective means of achieving our goals of improving academic outcomes for all students and ensuring student engagement and effective student support, for example, we should and likely will consider them.

As I understood the president's remarks at Wright, this approach is consistent with the laudable goals he described.

- Ed Hughes, member, Madison School Board

Login to post your comment. If you don't have an account, you may register for one.